HOW TO APPRECIATE CHARTERING

1.0 The need for chartering is most simply seen by testing out a real case. Two of most concern in 2012: what if theunique  purpose of the Olympics is to celebrate youth's potential or if the purpose The Economist was founded to mediate a discipline whose unique purspose was to end hunger and end capital abuse of youth? Generally, there is a trans-professional reasoning for chartering's system dynamics approach to mapping leadership. This is worth knowing about since we do not advise embedding chartering into an organisation's leadership communications unless those charged with making the most critical decisions value a wholly connected approach to responsibility and sustainability.

   

2.0 Chartering reflects The Economist's 1976 Entrepreneurial Revolution challenge that service plus economies would need to transform to different organisational structures from that which managed the age of mass production of things.  

 

Chartering provides an architectural standard of leadership communications for organisations that value a unique worldwide purpose that is actively grown the more knowledge networking capacities are experienced by the net generation.  The Economist's economics editor scripted the breadth and depth of worldwide entrpreneurial opportunity in the first (1984) book to foresee this generation's unprecedented innovation and human challenges. A byproduct of chartering experience is a complete system of intangibles accounting for organisations that wish their peoples emotional and social intelligences to multiply goodwill by being trusted, transparent and exponentially sustainable (more on this at valuetrue.com)

 

Research for chartering accelerated in response to an unique challenge in the late 1980s when organisational knowledge flows started  to be networked globally and real-time. Before the computer networked organisations paper-based faxes were the fastest way managers could share information. The multinational made real-time decisions within separate geographical nations.

 

Chatering champions the opportunity of visible mapping all the critical actions that needed to be interfaced if an action learning organisaition is to relentlessly ensure its purpose leads its globalisation. Because of this architectural integration it turns out that chartering is valuable for large organisations whose service is contextually detailed even if they are not international. We can conclude that an operational service franchise doesn't exist unless chartering is at least tacitly practised.

3.0 Chartering can also enable all concerned with a sector -ie both societies and businesses - to benchmark how the most purposeful organisations interface various action junctions so that a completely integrated service is delivered through tomorrow's evolution as well as today's current optimal flows. A common exercise within the full set of action junctions that need to be visualised is the identification of a sub-group that are currently most critical to a particular organisation or a specific segment of a wider marketplace.

James Wilson Final Paragraph, Prospectus for Birth of The Economist, August 1843: And lastly—if we required higher motives than bare utility, to induce that zeal, labour, and perseverance against all the difficulties which we shall have to encounter in this work—we have them. If we look abroad, we see within the range of our commercial intercourse whole islands and continents, on which the light of civilization has scarce yet dawned; and we seriously believe that FREE TRADE, free intercourse, will do more than any other visible agent to extend civilization and morality throughout the world—yes, to extinguish slavery itself. Then, if we look around us at home, we see ignorance, depravity, immorality, irreligion, abounding to an extent disgraceful to a civilized country; and we feel assured that there is little chance of successfully treating this great national disease while want and pauperism so much abound: we can little hope to improve the mental and moral condition of a people while their physical state is so deplorable:—personal experience has shown us in the manufacturing districts that the people want no acts of parliament to coerce education or induce moral improvement when they are in physical comfort—and that, when men are depressed with want and hunger, and agonized by the sufferings of helpless and starving children, no acts of parliament are of the slightest avail. We look far beyond the power of acts of parliament, or even of the efforts of the philanthropist or the charitable, however praiseworthy, to effect a cure for this great national leprosy; we look mainly to an improvement in the condition of the people. And we hope to see the day when it will be as difficult to understand how an act of parliament could have been made to restrict the food and employment of the people, as it is now to conceive how the mild, inoffensive spirit of Christianity could ever have been conceived into the plea of persecution and martyrdom, or how poor old wrinkled women, with a little eccentricity, were burned by our forefathers for witchcraft.

a short note -please tell me if you know of anyone truly interested in putting these ideas together a) dad and dr yunus must have told me a dozen times that one of the economic dynamics we are not yet using in social business startups is the compound consequence of social business start up only needing 2% profitability while old capital requires say 20%; all that differential between 2 and 20% can be put into exponentially rising social value multipliers- be that jobs that wouldn’t have been viable in  20% profit extracting system or incubating intrapreneurial ideas of those with lifetime knowhow and the most vocational passion to serve b) I read that in many big capitals up to 20% of nurses are reaching retirement age in the next 7 years; offering part-time capacity to a nursing agency there to extract profit from nurse and nursed isn’t the most purposeful proposition - so why not openly network a Social Business as the world's (or Scotland’s) most purposeful nurses agency c) as well as mobilizing freedom and goodwill multipliers of the market with no middleman and minimum bureaucrat other than community integrity, social entrepreneur searches reveal  hundreds of fragmented social projects started by nurses that could be interfaced and community empowering-  from taking youth off the street and training them as paranurses serving just one segment to bringing wellbeing to schools as being as important as any other literacy especially for girl power d) statistically: is there a more radical starting point in Britain for depoliticizing social services and empowering local community development?; if you think there is , tell me please!  e) doubtless medical and insurance professions would normally naysay this; buy if Britain is to help lead old Europe out of vicious spirals of job destruction and spending more on the old than investing in youth, then here's a starting point that arguably even the bbc could report round 360 degrees good news/views; and if the world's largest social business broadcaster ever started seeing the good news of radically improved non-politicised social services (compound 18% more to invest in community purpose as served) perhaps adam smith community economics may yet free the net generation to be that which sustained the happiest and most entrepreneurially productive lifestyle     The Next Ages of Man - The Economist, 24 December 1988 We're All Intrapreneurial Now - The Economist, 17 April 1982 A Future History of Privatisation - The Economist, 21 December 1991 Net Futures - The 2024 ReportChanging communications, and what makes people distant, bossy, etcChanging national politics Changing economics Changing employment  chris macrae www.businessmodels.tv www.youtube.com/safebanks economics in search of purpose - www.brandchartering.com allied references - http://erworld.tv - top 20 sustainability game : end nurseless villages

Micro financial discussion of America’s future

I urge students to join in this discussion. For 33 years my idea of free markets –and media truth - is to get consumers, societies and employees to question what opportunities and risks are compounding in particular markets – eg healthcare, energy, autos, advertising media, education, housing, banking .... Then 2 years ago I started to learn from Dr Yunus and Bangladeshi friends how to add on a second debate revolving round sustainability futures of a place and its communities. I believe that’s absolutely the most interesting reason to become competent at microfinancial system analysis – see footnote

History seems to show that places and nations sustain better futures when they invest in their next generation. I believe for hundreds of years USA was best for world at that, initially in opposition to the English who were worst in world at that when The Declaration of Independence was launched.. Ironically some time about 20 years ago America’s systems fanned by virulent tv advertising and big business lobbies over democracy turned viciously against investing in future generations. What happened to american banks is a seminal social and business case – a topic I have heard many scary lectures on in the last 6 months from Paul Krugman down needs analyzing for opportunities and threats. In 1990 there were no American banks that were too big to fail. By 2007 all of the biggest 10 were. In 1990, the biggest 10 controlled less than 20% of financial transactions, now its the vast majority. What are these big 10 banking systems designed round? Rampant speculation not investment in future generation. To a man all the citizen bailout speakers I have hear recommended that Obama bit the bullet in the first quarter of 2009, and downside the big 10 wherever they were bankrupt which probably the majority if not all were by any accounting standard that would have been applied to any other sector but banks.

Students need in my opinion to question what they are being taught. Specifically does your university’s business and economic schools put the debate of: is America investing in future generations front and foremost in how you do economics and business analysis? If it doesn’t, Dr Yunus networks are the only ones I know of that can globally free your speech and your action learnings . They are for example challenging vice chancellors right now – what future does your business school rankings have if you don’t contribute to the missing curriculum of sustainability m the missing curriculum of investing in your next generation? At least 8 universities around the world will be sharing their first years studies on this in November though currently only one is from USA, and 3 are from Japan. Perhaps this is telling as Japan has made no progress over the last 20 years since it had its own banking bailout. But the monies involved there were small beer compared with the 20 trillion dollars already wasted and returned to the big banks to apparently continue their hyper speculative behaviors guaranteed by being too big to fail

So how do you see this. Completely differently or the same way as the above?

Microcredit world class branding footnote.
The freedom to be income generating that truly designed microcredit systems empower is enormous as a consumer good. But perhaps the even greater system advantage of microcredit is the freedom to save for your next generation. That’s’ what Grameen members elected to do with their 16 decisions when the bank for the poor was legally constituted by Bangladeshi law in 1983. You probably know many of the immediate decisions Dr Yunus took on children’s behalf. A Grameen bank branch loses a star rating if it fails to get all of its members children to school. He became focused on children’s nutrition when he observed village children were night blind. The first thing Grameen did was to become the nation’s largest retailer of carrot seeds. As you know from recent future capitalism news, Dr Yunus’ first global market social business partnership challenge was milk products – thus Grameen Danone is now world famous for functional foods designed for poorest kids diets. However it was the same logic – greatest investment in next generation that caused Grameen leadership to make 2 amazing sustainability investment decisions with the poorest savings in 1996: to invest in mobiles ending digital divides and to invest in solar energy.

FROM YOU CAN HEAR ME NOW TO YES YOU & US CAN
I am not sure that Dr Yunus understood the enormity of the future investment in telephone ladies was about as early as he made the decision in 1996. I think his immediate interest was connecting 125000 hubs of 60 villagers per centre (7.5 million female members of Grameen) into the greatest intelligence network for the poorest- sharing market prices and life critical information across rural Bangladesh for the first time. I don’t know that he realized that this greatest sustainability investment of the new millennium would compound so Bangladesh in 2010s is as much a world leader in designing mobile infrastructure design http://www.grameensolutions.com http://bankabillion.org as India’s Bangalore has become in the internet. And as for the sustainability investment in solar who would have thought that one bank for the poor would now install more solar units than the whole of the USA? and that government ministers that take the climate crisis seriously treat Dhaka as the world epicentre of climate crisis dialogues? So yes you can use what you learn from microcredit knowhow to debate whether your nation is investing in future generations, and it isn’t to take actions in universities and other places you live top reform this now and join Dr Yunus in branding 2010s at The Joy of Life decade when millennium goals and ending systems that are too big to fail become the core reason why congresses and mass media exist.

21st month celebration of future capitalism- 21 months after launch of the future capitalism book on sustainability system designs, dr yunus has started a newsletter and newtorkers club that you can subscribe to here

---

Future Capitalism BookLaunch, Jan 2008 – Nine Year Old asks Smartest Question NY Bankers have ever heard

Hi Alan Webber

I have wanted to ask you a few questions since reading your USA Today article

http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/05/giving-the-poor.html#more

recommending Dr Yunus for the Nobel Economics prize so as to end the separation of Nobel Peace and Economics.

How often do you chat to dr yunus? Is it the case as my dad hypothesised back in 1984 http://www.normanmacrae.com/netfuture.html from The Economist that macroeconomics’ wrong metrics/media/education can end human sustainability- in a sense, will the 2010’s be humanity’s final re-run of  the Einstein-Gandhi battle with misleading professions of English colonialism gone global?

CREATIVITY THAT SUSTAINS HUMANITY

I don’t know how often you keep in touch with Dr Yunus but in the 21 months since I first met him, he seems to have been linking a new sustainability investment network together every 3 months. Microcredit is no longer the main challenge Dr Yunus talks about, nor the 1970s Bangladeshi origins of social business models as system designing replicable grassroots franchises round sustaining 10 times more economical market exchanges for and by the poorest communities. Now, global branding of social business leadership partnering networks are being formed thanks especially  to saskia and hans at http://www.grameencreativelab.com/  out of Germany

HOW & WHERE THIS ENTREPRENEURIAL REVOLUTION CAN LEAD

Just my interpretation as a brand architect researcher : the idea of getting 100 global brand ceos and a few vice chancellors together

– to the vice chancellor the question is given there is a missing curriculum of sustainability investment where will your business school be ranked in a few years if it doesn’t start contributing to it now;

–to global brand ceos the question : is your global market free to value sustainability's exponential dynamics and if not why not benchmark and form brand partnerships until it is

Take the world famous grameen danone as an example, its no longer only a nutritional yogurt for poorest kids in Bangladesh but a sponsorship platform of eg an ecological project in china so danone’s name is planted as the best there is – why not sponsor sustainability projects as well as footballers- Yunus used his Mandela birthday talk to send a video to FIFA saying why not use South Africa’s 2010 soccer world cup to celebrate millennium goals as well as football; whether FIFA has responded to yunus I don’t know but it did announce during Clinton global week 2 partnerships – setting up 20 youth football camps across Africa and with visa financial football as a web-based game through which it commits to train 20 million in financial literacy; meanwhile another grameen partner adidas is being challenged to end shoelessness of children with $1 sneakers

I copied a few more people whose insights on what’s possible as dr yunus invites us all to brand 2010s as joy of life decade will be far more than mine

Zara from Georgetown who asked you question after me as where is a sustainable business graduate to go these days? Sam Daley-Harris founder of microcredisummit aiming to make Kenya’s 2010 April even more exciting than the 1997 conference that set the goal of reaching 100 million poorest families with hi-trust banking; Mostofa a Bangladeshi villager at London University who Dr Yunus asked to network together 5000 youth ambassadors like Zara; Lamiya Yunus Centre's http://www.yunuscentre.org  chief of staff whose been guiding mostofa’s 3 year development of http://yunusforum.net  as a citizens project and outreach web; also http://www.muhammadyunus.org/Sign-Up/ appears to be the master newsletter to yunus

..

sofia of www.londoncreativelabs.com  who facilitated dr yunus 69^th birthday dialogue; paul rose the BBC ’s main solar and polar broadcaster who wrote up dr yunus 69^th birthday week celebration http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8130130.stm

And Melissa our host at last week’s conference and designer of Maryland’s Social Value Creation Initiative; and Heather whose 200 peoples networks across USA http://ourfinancialsecurity.org/ aim to mobilise the people’s joyous retrieval of $20 trillion of unsustainably allocated tarp funds

Attached one way to guide discussions of what is the world’s greatest invention and the announcement of 7 nov get-together in Berlin of revolutionary global corporations and vice chancellors

chris macrae

DC 301 881 1655

http://www.brandchartering.com/

Grameen Intel - from 2008 Intel corporate report

Grameen-Intel Social Business. In 2008, Intel Capital—Intel’s global

investment organization—formed a business venture with Grameen Trust

aimed at applying self-sustaining information and communication technology

(ICT) solutions to address issues related to poverty, healthcare, and

education in developing countries. The initiative, which will be launched in

Bangladesh, is based on the social business model created by Nobel Peace

Prize winner Muhammad Yunus, who founded Grameen Bank in 1976 to

promote micro-financing and community development. The new business

venture combines Intel’s technology innovation and Grameen’s extensive

experience in creating opportunities for economic development and

income generation at the village level.

---

Anyone up for giving this concept a go up to and including june29-nice to have a birthday present to take to dhaka for the world's youngest 69 year old.

Stories that viralise in a webbed world dont need to be perfectly produced but capture imagination so others feel like adding to the story   Gist here’s a nation that’s just over third of a century old; its about 1/50th of world’s people with about 1/1000 of world resources   It tries so hard to develop itself and to network its discoveries; imagine if the world with 999/10000 of the resources had the same yes we can attitude   Who are the first others we would want to tell these stories: -         probably 5000 youth that yunus suggests could be linked in as bottom-up ambassadors -         -probably those who get that future capitalism is the greatest leadership partnership strategy and sustainable above zero-sum economic game -...

The story of the safest banking system by and for people   The story of jobs and learning for all women – progress so far in Bangla from about 1% to over 50%   The story of how even as its ending poverty its having to try harder than anyother nation with renewable energy cos its likely to be first 100 mn nation to be washed away if (polar) ice melts any more   The story of using mobiles/internet for the poor   5th story?

We have a bbc presenter in Paul. A movie producer in vivian, a journalist in alan, a storyteller in yunus,  a pop song writer in tom, a budding writer in alexis, an adviser on what publishes in clive; a host of 10000 people meetings in marriah ... I dont know if alfonso is online but he’s writings on bangladesh poverty are the most tearjerking I have read ; though we can look for others; at the same time he has a style rule of always make key decisions out of optimism   Sam’s microcreditsummit is very memorable when it storytells   If we say we are going to try and do this we can send out queries asking whether there are other well wishers –eg amartya sen, clinton, skoll – who might want to join in   This is also the story of the other way round from top-down globalisation which president obama has appealed everyone searches for

 the greatest identities throughout history of communications are those that uplift people and include everyone in the invitation to join in whilst permitting peer groups to huddle and share their own narratives in creating a world.   

Do tell me if you see any way of moving this forward - thanks

chris

http://www.brandchartering.com/

I have spent about a third of millennium 3 so far attending well meaning sustainability networks and joing their discussions and where possible replicating any of their collaboration projects that have been proven to work in one community and are ready for vital use in others. In almost every network it becomes necessary to debate measurements. Do you have any advice on 1) a network that might want such a YES WE CAN debate now? 2) how to edit the sort of message that folows so that it makes a positive start within the contexts and transparency of  valuation experiences the network already has http://brandchartering.com/ My 30 years of work on compounding purposeful organisational systems concludes that those fewest metrics that everyone attends to most frequently (eg quarterly) dominate. You cant use long lists to achieve that. So for example if we were designing the most effective network at ending malaria we shouldnt require every product it used to be 100% green- its some other network's job to make those green products more and accessible Ultimately if I could see 2 customised metrics being applied consciously by everyone in a system or network that's where I would start -just 2. One would be about sustaining positive cashflow so the organisation lives to compound the future, the other would be what unique heroic purpose-goal it was reinvesting its surplus in The only published maths that I have ever seen that is sufficient is that of Muhammad Yunus - creating a world without poverty, social business models , the future of capitalism. Well over a quarter of a million micro-bankers use that maths in bangladesh and over the years as well as being one of the few nations ahead of millennoum goals it now installs more solar units than the whole of te usa through one network and it has shared with wortldwide replicators the only safe banking network -one that sustains every community its banks reach rather than compounding unkown risks onto the already poorest communities. There is little point extolling consciousness if we cannot all return the safety of banking to be for and by all people. We can help Obama do that from tomorrown on but dont leave it to the same experts that run wall street's previous compound risk system It is a bit over-demanding but simple enough to ensure yes we can design unique organsiations and partnering networks - to achieve every sustainability goal if we know where they are and how to collaboratively network around them. Yes we can but only if we are grounded enough in micro details so that we connect the most urgent dots first often flowing the very least thing resources but focusing the very maximum human energies locally available I included a dvd of short good news videos from bangladesh in delegates goodie bags at theglobasummit - they can also be accessed at http://yunus10000.com/ - our current goal is to try to reach youth in every us university so that they know the metrics choice that is needded if yes we can sustain the world with USA as lead partner instead of accuidental lead agent of millenium destruiction from tomorrow on. If you are working on one goal until you see its progress replicating worldwide and want me to try and work up a simle map for you to audit it - I will try as long as we can share your case with claboration uni clubs http://collaborationcafe.tv/ http://www.egroups.com/group/microup

chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk tel usa 301 881 1655

Free Market of End Poverty: Greatest Living Scripts - vote info@worldcitizen.tv 1 Schumacher (Economics as if people mattered , 1973): The heart of the matter, as I see it, is the stark fact that world poverty is primarily a problem of 2 million villages, and thus a problem of 2 billion villagers. The solution cannot be found in the world's cities. Unless the hinterland can be made tolerable, the problem of world poverty is intolerable, and inevitably will get worse 1.1 Translation Yes IT CAN be useful to make these edits: Micro is Beautiful. Entrepreneurial always begins with the triangle of small (a few people), deep (deeper context is where innovation comes as anyone who has read a word of Einstein or other 20th C maths greats will appreciate), as long as it takes to explore many unlearnings before discovering how to deliver a previously unknown life critical service. Once an end poverty microentrepreneur has mapped a franchise so any passionately caring team can see what need connecting to practice and relentlessly improve its unique purpose, replicate it as big as connecting truth worldwide can get

YES WE CAN CHOOSE WHAT TO DO NOW -how to use media and value leaders so that every community thrives and interact www (win-win-wins) - community ref egroup MicroUp Millennium 3: Shall we live in a hi-trust age where people are rewarded for multiplying goodwill or an era where we compound losss of sustainability through destroying trust through every community? I first started studying nations as brands in 1989 - publishing a case on Singapore as a national brand. Whenever I investigate an identity that hasn't previously been systemized as a brand, I try to benchmark something that has sustained compound growth around every coordinate of productivity and demand by multiplying goodwill. I am delighted to work with anyone on open sourcing sustainable nation charters, such as Bangladesh which President Clinton has argued to be the greatest developing economy model in our networked age as it emphasizes both sustainability and win-win-win in partnering capitalism and society and what Yes We can youth of the world search to turn from dreams to reality . It’s not that there were no conflicts with Singapore serving the world but anyone who roughly knows its emergence from poverty of being bossed by British Empire to today's thriving and independent nation can’t begrudge Singapore its journey. TALE OF 2 USAs I have never majored in history. Being born 1951 in London as a misplaced Scot (an early worldwide nation that lost its independence around 1700 with the result that more of its people had sailed the 7 seas by 1850 than remained on the homeland), for most of my youth America was seemed (and probably was) greatest collaborative identity in human progress. The race to the moon in the 1960s defined my generation's hope and optimism, and bit for bit was the most sustained productive interface of man and computer yet seen -un less you have another nomination for us to link here RSVP info@worldcitizen.tv However being a superpower exerts extraordinary tolls. Special interests - both geographical, creed and industry sector (recently banking , from 1950s post industrial military complex) are some of greatest compound threats to a nation being win-win-win for every other decently governed (for and by the people) place. During my lifetime there has never been more compound destruction of goodwill for the USA brand than 2001-2008. I don’t think it was Bush's fault but I have evidence from the first quarter of 2001 that he was misadvised on everything corporate. In 2000 economists at Brookings and social lawyers at Georgetown publish a book on the goodwill crisis - Unseen wealth. Conclusions included fact that all globalizing professions have not yet changed their semi-monopolies to rule from: · age where machines were main investment to age where people and knowledge interactions are · from an age where geographies are separate as bases for their people's productivities to an age where net working’s virtually productivities differentiates the most innovation · from an age where a few people at the top are responsible for creating jobs to every youth is an entrepreneur responsible firstly for sustaining jobs in communities as well as having the huge opportunity to replicate the most life critical service inventions openly worldwide . In goodwill branding charters:  you  don’t exactly pay your money and makes your choice –if you do invent something that can change the world why not plant learning by doing networks through hi-trust peers and replicate franchises worldwide hat sustain community good everywhere they connect  at no cost, rather than global branding 1.0 whose professional self-interests chain you to spending a billion dollars trying to get awareness through tv ads. 2001-2008 USA Led By Compounding Unseen Risks. 2009 Bend the curve through Change the worldwide needs with USA as hi-trust partner   Bottom line Unseen Wealth school of economics declared 2000:  unknown risks would every quarter compound loss of responmsibility of every global market's purpose for the greater good, until an opposite system of metrics was included in governance. For peoples anywhere to be happy again we would need to free ourselves from failing systems of  global management consultancy1.0 whose hidden persuaders included ruling by unsustainable numbers of the then Big 5 accountants –whose 20th century hangover  monopolises who their vested interest numbers reward and punish. I interviewed the chairlady of Unseen Wealth’s report soon after she had presented it to Bush's transitional team. It scared them to death that every profession was being shown to be compounding the loss of its Hippocratic oath and made it clear she's get no more research funds to continue.   The good and bad news of every sustainability crisis being compounded by a common mathematical mistake is that change the maths and the Yes We can generation can quickly start innovating all the changes that President Osama’s extraordinary vision and micro-grounding gravitates. The first 6 months and the next 4 years are the most exciting for the USA brand and the worldwide connections of opportunities and threats of nations that 7 billion people worldwide and near 300 million USA inside may ever interact.

---

ONE picture to inuagurate yes we can america
please send us one that everyone can love to find their way onto and start interacting with others

this example tries to illustrate
from east and south I have tried to label the 10 deep microcredit network action learning exchanges that 93 congressmen are demanding the world bank collaborates around